News Ticker

Treasury’s Living Standards Framework – is growing the four capitals a good thing?

The Treasury’s much vaunted Living Standards Framework (LSF) asserts that raising living standards requires increasing New Zealand’s four capitals, human, natural, social and financial/physical.

So here is a question for the framework’s promoters in Treasury:

“Suppose a policy proposal promises to increase all four capitals, how would a Treasury analyst determine if the proposal was a good thing?”

The ‘obvious’ answer is: “By applying Treasury’s Guide to Social Cost Benefit analysis”.  After all, why else does the guide exist?

Yet, if this is Treasury’s answer, what value does the LSF add?

Alternatively, if Treasury thinks its guide is flawed, why does it not fix the flaws and make it fit for purpose?

It would be really helpful if Treasury could clarify such matters.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: